With California’s Nov. 8 general election on the horizon, voters are seeing a barrage of ads centered on the two measures, Prop 26 and Prop 27, that would make it legal to bet on sports in California. 4f1g4m
Both props have the backing of stakeholders with deep pockets.
Prop 26, a measure allowing sports betting at California tribal casinos and licensed horse racetracks, has sponsorship from the largest and most prosperous Native American tribes. Established online sports betting companies are the financial ers of Prop 27, which would allow online sports betting in California.
Contribution activity slowed down a bit in August, with a $25 million donation on Aug. 31 swelling the monthly total to just north of $41 million. As of Sept. 2, $390 million had been spent on Prop 26 and Prop 27, further making it the most expensive ballot battle in California history.
Here’s a quick look at the contribution activity from last month. All but one contributions to or oppose Prop 26 and Prop 27 in August came from in-state organizations.
REPORT: Prop 27 Would Generate $2.8 Billion in Annual California Sports Betting Revenue
August 2022 Donations to Prop 26 and Prop 27 Campaigns 2dx5k
| Contribution Date | Amount | Ballot Measure | Contributor Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8/31/2022 | $25,000,000 | Opposition to Prop 27 | San Manuel Band of Mission Indians |
| 8/17/2022 | $10,000,000 | of Prop 26 | Pechanga Band of Indians |
| 8/18/2022 | $5,000,000 | of Prop 26 | Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation |
| 8/30/2022 | $485,000 | Opposition to Prop 26 | Blackstone Gaming |
| 8/17/2022 | $300,000 | Opposition to Prop 26 | Sahara Dunes Casino LP |
| 8/30/2022 | $136,234 | of Prop 26 | Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation |
| 8/31/2022 | $84,195.72 | of Prop 27 | Crown Gaming Inc. (DraftKings) |
| 8/16/2022 | $6,686.94 | of Prop 26 | Pechanga Band of Indians |
| 8/12/2022 | $2,811.60 | Opposition to Prop 27 | San Manual Band of Mission Indians |
| 8/26/2022 | $2,537.80 | Opposition to Prop 27 | San Manuel Band of Mission Indians |
| 8/29/2022 | $1,347.42 | of Prop 26 | Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians |
| 8/29/2022 | $395.83 | of Prop 26 | Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians |
| 8/25/2022 | $348 | Opposition to Prop 27 | San Manuel Band of Mission Indians |
| 8/22/2022 | $20 | Opposition to Prop 27 | San Manuel Band of Mission Indians |
| Total Spent: | $41,019,577.30 |
Prop 26 Contributions 3w2v38
The largest contribution of August, $25 million, came from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians. That tribe owns Yaamava’ Resort & Casino, the tribal-led California online sports betting on the 2024 ballot, so it makes sense why it would strongly oppose Prop 27. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians has now donated more than $78 million to fund No on 27.
Before August, the Pechanga Band of Indians spent over $15 million on the Yes on 26 campaign. It added about $10 million from its coffers in August. The tribe owns Pechanga Resort Casino, the second-largest casino in California.
The Yocha Dehe Winton Nation also contributed about $15 million before August. Last month, it spent another $5 million to Prop 26. It owns Cache Creek Casino Resort, the seventh-biggest casino in California. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, which owns three casinos in California, added about $1,700 last month to its previous total contribution of $10.25 million.
ers of Prop 26 began funding the measure last spring, with the Pechanga Band of Indians leading the way in April 2021. Before August, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria spent $30 million promoting Prop 26. The tribe, which owns Graton Resort & Casino, is still the biggest er of the Yes on 26 campaign.
Prop 27 Contributions 1k1119
DraftKings became the top donor to Prop 27 in August when it chipped in $84,195.72 on Aug. 31. It has now contributed just over $25 million to the campaign. Fellow sportsbook companies FanDuel, BetMGM, Fanatics (FanaticsBet), and PENN Gaming (Barstool Sportsbook) have all donated exactly $25 million apiece.
California card rooms are opposed to Prop 26, and have entirely funded the No on 26 campaign. They compete directly with tribal casinos for customers. They also claim age of Prop 26 would allow tribal casinos more leniency to sue the card rooms in costly — and what the card rooms deem unnecessary — lawsuits.
Two card rooms contributed to the No on 26 efforts in August. Sahara Dunes Casino LP (Lake Elsinore Casino) contributed $300,000, its first contribution. Blackstone Gaming spent $485,000 in August. Previously, Blackstone Gaming, a third-party provider of proposition player services for card rooms throughout California, including Ocean’s Eleven Casino, Larry Flynt’s Lucky Lady Casino, and Hustler Casino, spent $1 million on the No on 26 campaign.
Prop 27 backers began contributing in August 2021 with a $12.5 million influx from Bally Bet. Beyond the five $25 million contributions listed above, WynnBET has also donated $12.5 million.
Three California tribes — two offering limited gaming, one offering full gaming — and nonprofits that fight homelessness have sided with the corporations to Prop 27. According to state records, none of these groups has contributed money to pro-Prop 27 or anti-Prop 26 efforts.
ROLL CALL: Here Are All the Groups That Prop 26 and Prop 27, and Why
About the Author 3i2771
